Joachim Jungherr
University of Bonn
About me: |
![]() |
Call for Papers:
June 17-18, 2019: Workshop on
A Dynamic Economic and Monetary Union
at the Barcelona GSE Summer Forum
|
||||||
Working Papers |
||||||
![]() |
Debt Dilution and Debt Overhang
Barcelona GSE Working Paper 997
We introduce long-term debt (and a maturity choice) into a dynamic model of
firm financing and production. This allows us to study two distortions which are
absent from standard models of short-term debt: (1.) Debt dilution distorts firms’
choice of debt; (2.) Debt overhang distorts investment. In a dynamic model of
production, leverage, and debt maturity, we show that the two distortions interact
to reduce investment, increase leverage, and increase the default rate. We find that
the macroeconomic effects of debt dilution and debt overhang can be important:
A financial reform which increases investment, output, and welfare in a standard
model of short-term debt can have the opposite effect in a model with short-term
debt and long-term debt.
|
|||||
![]() |
A Blessing in Disguise? Market Power and Growth with Financial Frictions
Barcelona GSE Working Paper 998
Firm market power raises growth in the presence of financial frictions. The
reason is that self financing becomes more effective if firm earnings are higher.
We test this mechanism using Korean manufacturing data 1963-2003. We find
that more concentrated sectors grow faster. This positive empirical relationship
between concentration and growth gets weaker as credit becomes more abundant.
Using a simple growth model, we study counterfactuals. The observed rise of
concentration in Korea until the mid-1970s has increased manufacturing value
added 1963-2003 on average by at least 0.6% per year. The effect of firm market
power on worker welfare is ambiguous.
|
|||||
Work in Progress |
||||||
![]() |
Slow Debt, Deep Recessions
Business credit lags GDP growth by about one year. This contributes to high
leverage during recessions and slow deleveraging. We show that a model in which
firms borrow long-term can replicate the sluggish adjustment of firm debt. In the
model, slow-moving debt has important effects for real activity. High levels of firm
debt issued during expansions are only gradually reduced during the subsequent
downturn. This generates an adverse feedback loop between low investment and
high credit spreads and thereby amplifies the downturn. Sluggish deleveraging
slows down the recovery. The equilibrium is constrained inefficient because firms
exert an externality on the holders of previously issued debt. We study optimal
stabilization policies. State-contingent debt taxes and investment subsidies can
reduce macroeconomic volatility by about one third.
|
|||||
Publications |
||||||
![]() |
Bank Opacity and Financial Crises
Working Paper; Barcelona GSE Focus
This paper studies a model of endogenous bank opacity. Why do banks choose to hide their risk
exposure from the public? And should policy makers force banks to be more transparent? In the model,
bank opacity is costly because it encourages banks to take on too much risk. But opacity also reduces
the incidence of bank runs (for a given level of risk taking). Banks choose to be inefficiently opaque
if the composition of their asset holdings is proprietary information. In this case, policy makers can
improve upon the market outcome by imposing public disclosure requirements (such as Pillar Three of
Basel II). However, full transparency maximizes neither efficiency nor stability. The model can explain
why empirically a higher degree of bank competition leads to increased transparency.
|
|||||
Teaching |
||||||
![]() ![]() |
During the fall of 2018, I am teaching the first half of Macroeconomics in the M.Sc. in Economics of the University of Bonn. In spring 2019, I will teach a course on Financial Frictions and Macroeconomics in the Macroeconomic Policy and Financial Markets Program of the Barcelona GSE. |
|